|Type of post:||Training Band news item|
|Posted By:||Shirley Evans|
|Date Posted:||Tue, 14 May 2019|
You may have seen in the news recently that The Royal Opera House (ROH) has lost its appeal in the case of a viola player who suffered hearing damage during a rehearsal of Richard Wagner’s Die Walküre.
In the original case in 2012 Christopher Goldscheider sued for damages caused by acoustic shock – a condition with symptoms including tinnitus, hyperacusis (sensitivity to noise) and dizziness – after being exposed to noise levels exceeding 130 decibels while sitting directly behind the brass section during rehearsal. Acoustic shock is caused by sudden excessive noise, and not general deterioration of hearing.
Mr Goldscheider won that case and recently, following an appeal from ROH, the Court of Appeal ruled unanimously that the ROH failed to take reasonable steps to protect Mr Goldscheider during the 2012 rehearsal and failed to act on dangerous noise levels until after the injury.
Since the ruling there have been various articles and discussions about what this might mean and the future of live music – both for performers and audience. But what does this mean for leisure-time music groups?
In our view it's very unlikely a similar case could be successfully brought against a leisure-time group so we don’t think there is any need for groups to worry or make wholesale changes.
However, the case does serve as an important prompt for groups to spend a little bit of timing thinking about hearing protection, even if the risk to leisure-time musicians is likely to be lower compared to professionals.
You should consider two factors; sound levels and exposure time. The initial task is to establish if there is a risk. Proportionate and appropriate should be your watch words. If there is risk, it’s about taking some simple, reasonable steps to mitigate it by: